Featured Image -- 1890

Syrian Support Group: CIA Outreach Agents & Terrorist Arms Suppliers

A must-read analysis of the Nonprofit Industrial Complex.

thewallwillfall

16th January 2016

The Nonprofit Industrial Complex: an Accessory to the Crime of Imperialism.

“This is an open-ended exploration [carried out by Friends of Syria] of some of the outside figures offering assistance to the Syrian Support Group (SSG).

These figures have assisted in the granting of a license that enabled the Group to effectively send arms and money to the ‘Free Syrian Army’. The license was provided by the US State Dept’s oddly named ‘Office of Terrorism Finance and Economic Sanctions Policy’.

Part of the Office of Terrorism Finance’s stated remit is to coordinate: “efforts to create, modify, or terminate unilateral sanctions regimes as appropriate to the changing international situation, such as Iran, Syria, and Libya.” The license was granted in July 2012, based on a May application letter—a remarkably short time considering the nature of the SSG’s objectives and the complexities of the situation.

With the license the SSG…

View original post 3,208 more words

US STATE DEPT. INFO-BIMBO BOMBS AGAIN

scumbag-steve    NYTUSBombsHospital

Since the bombing of the Doctors without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan by U.S. forces, the United States government has actually had the gall to blame Russia for striking six hospitals in Syria. It only gets worse when you realize that the U.S. government tried nearly every trick in the book to dodge any responsibility for the tragedy which left 22 people dead. The U.S. has changed their story at least four times, refusing to accept responsibility at first, and later claiming that the hospital was “mistakenly struck” by U.S. forces, then saying that the hospital was hit because Taliban fighters were firing guns from the hospital, and Afghan forces had requested the strike after being engaged in a “tenacious fight” for the city.

Is U.S. bombing of Afghan hospital a war crime? http://tinyurl.com/pk9xgg3

U.S. military struggles to explain how it wound up bombing Doctors Without Borders hospital: http://tinyurl.com/oq2j2ck

Doctors Without Borders airstrike: US alters story for fourth time in four days: http://tinyurl.com/qfvwfhy

The outrage that resulted around the world over the bombing of the hospital must have given some eager young PR intern at the U.S. State Department the inspiration to come up with an even worse atrocity – bombing six hospitals! By the Russians!

Reuters: The United States has “operational information” that leads U.S. officials to believe Russian military aircraft hit a hospital while carrying out bombing raids in Syria, the State Department said on Thursday. Since the start of the Russian bombing campaign on Sept. 30, various reports from media and civilian groups have charged that Russian warplanes have hit hospitals with their air strikes.

U.S. believes Russian bombing in Syria hit hospital: http://tinyurl.com/o3wejtw

As can be seen in the cringeworthy, deeply embarrassing videos below, the “operational information” comes, as usual, from “Syrian NGOs on the ground” and “open source reporting” – which means they still get their information from the usual State Department sources: George Soros-funded NGOs like the White Helmets, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (a man who lives in Coventry, England), Bellingcat and the Brown Moses Blog (unemployed office worker Eliot Higgins), and of course open source reporting – the Internet.

In other words, when people ask the U.S. State Department how they know that Russia bombed six hospitals in Syria, the answer is – we read it on the Internet.

Syria hospitals Russia accused of bombing don’t exist:

Syria hospitals Russia accused of bombing don’t exist – Defense Ministry: http://tinyurl.com/omyfehc

RT Grills US State Dept over claims Russia airstrike hit a hospital in Syria:

Elizabeth Trudeau (Director, Office of Press Relations. U.S. Department of State), the latest in a long line of U.S. State Department spokespersons with the unenviable job of explaining American foreign policy, refused to give any details on the locations of hospitals in Syria allegedly bombed by Russia. This is due to the fact that these hospitals never existed.

As Stuart Hooper of 21st Century Wire reports, five of the six Syrian hospitals that the U.S. claims were hit by Russia do not exist, and the sixth hospital (the one that actually exists) is still standing and shows no signs of being hit or attacked in any way.

5 of 6 Syrian Hospitals Allegedly Hit by Russian Airstrikes Don’t Exist: http://tinyurl.com/pvavbwd

A tip of the hat to AP reporter Matt Lee for keeping it real at the State Department press briefings!

Follow Matt Lee on Facebook and Twitter:

https://www.facebook.com/APDiploWriter/

https://twitter.com/APDiploWriter


Undeniable facts about the US, Russia & Syria that people need to get into their heads: http://tinyurl.com/qx5fbyf #FireCarterB4WW3

Keep up with the latest geopolitical news with Webster Tarpley and the Tax Wall Street Party morning briefings:

http://tarpley.net/

https://twitter.com/WebsterGTarpley

https://www.facebook.com/webstertarpley?fref=ts

http://twsp.us/

https://twitter.com/TaxWallStParty

https://www.facebook.com/taxwallstreetparty/?fref=ts

https://www.facebook.com/UnitedFrontAgainstAusterity/?fref=ts

Featured Image -- 1873

More puzzles about BBC’s “Saving Syria’s Children” documentary

The British propaganda machine has been hard at work attacking Assad from day one, and started this lunatic neocon line that “Obama is being weak” with Syria and needs to follow through on his idiotic “red line” threat / boast.

OffGuardian

by BlackCatte

This is our second look at the work of Robert Stuart, concerning the BBC Panorama documentary Saving Syria’s Children. (go here for our first instalment). When did the alleged chemical attacks actually occur? Why do accounts of the timing differ so widely? And why did producer Darren Conway become defensive and incoherent when asked one simple question?

The BBC Panorama documentary Saving Syria’s Children began as quite low key coverage of the work of two British doctors (Rola Hallam and Saleyha Ahsan) visiting the Atareb hospital in Aleppo on August 26 2013. But then – the story goes – completely by chance, while they were filming, there was an incendiary attack (originally described as a “chemical attack”), supposedly by the Syrian government, on the Urem Al-Kubra school 8 or 9 miles away, fortuitously permitting the film crew to get dramatic footage of the victims arriving…

View original post 1,533 more words

Mystery Revealed: What frightened the USS Donald Cook so much in the Black Sea?

Futurist Trendcast

Sergio says: Dear Lada, I found this article on: What frightened the USS Donald Cook so much in the Black Sea? http://www.voltairenet.org/article185860.html. Did you know of this and do you have any comments. Thanks, Sergio.

Thank you, Sergio, for an interesting link and question. Yes, I have lots to say on this. There were some materials in the Russians press, although this information was diligently covered up and suppressed in the US and West in general.

USS donald cook

Quote from the article in Voltairenet.org: “The State Department acknowledged that the crew of the destroyer USS Donald Cook has been gravely demoralized ever since their vessel was flown over in the Black Sea by a Russian Sukhoi-24 (Su-24) fighter jet which carried neither bombs nor missiles but only an electronic warfare device.

On 10 April 2014, the USS Donald Cook entered the waters of the Black Sea and on 12 April a Russian Su-24 tactical…

View original post 1,674 more words

Lincoln’s Bloody War against the Moderate Rebels

bunker_fig09a   Lincoln: “The Yankee Nero,” Comic News, London, 1864

Abraham Lincoln is a butcher who attacks his own people. He is responsible for the blood of countless Americans and has to go. He declared a brutal war on the democratic, peace-loving opposition in the South. There is no end in sight to the bloodshed until Lincoln steps down or is removed from power. We can’t just stand idly by and watch the carnage as the death toll grows by the day. We have to do something!

Mr. Lincoln has lost his legitimacy and is no longer fit to rule!

017_Matt_Morgan_Comic_News_11_26_1864_Vampire_Lincoln   bunker_fig07a

Yes, that’s right! Not Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, but LINCOLN!

Assad Did Not Gas Civilians in Ghouta in 2013: http://tinyurl.com/pljw39s
Did Assad gas his own people?: http://tinyurl.com/n9pkd69
The Sarin Gas Attack Lie: http://tinyurl.com/owfqn5c
A Brief Guide to Western Media Propaganda For Syria: http://tinyurl.com/odbozsj

If you had lived in London or Paris during the time of the American Civil War, this is the Abraham Lincoln you would have known – not the great (or perhaps greatest) American President, liberator of slaves, preserver of the Union, proponent of the American system of economics, etc. The aristocracy of Great Britain (especially Lord Palmerston) and France were anti-Lincoln and pro-Confederacy, and there was a very strong sentiment among their ranks that Britain and France should intervene in order to stop the bloodshed and help the rebels gain their freedom from the tyrant Lincoln who was not only slaughtering his own people but was even cracking down on the once free press of the United States and exercising total government control over the media. As current US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power would say, Britain and France had the “responsibility to protect”.

Members of the Ku Klux Klan yell as they fly Confederate flags during a rally at the statehouse in Columbia   The moderate opposition

If all of this sounds very familiar – wait, there’s more!

You’ll never guess in a million years which nation actually intervened in order to stop this planned Anglo-French intervention. Go ahead and try anyway!

Did you say Canada? Sorry, guess again. That was the place where the British troops were waiting to swoop in and bring “peace and freedom”.

Mexico? No, not them either.

Japan? No, you’re thinking of something else.

Did you by any chance say Russia? Really? Russia? The evil Czarist Russian Empire? That’s insane!

What’s even more insane is that you would be correct! It was Russia – Lincoln’s only significant international friend was Czar Alexander II of Russia, and yes, they did intervene on behalf of the Union. If you didn’t hear about this in school, you might want to ask yourself why.

I highly recommend listening to Dr. Webster G. Tarpley’s excellent and scrupulously researched 2013 CSPAN Lecture on the Russian Fleets of 1863:

In 2013, the leader of Russia intervened to keep the peace yet again.

A Plea for Caution From Russia, by Vladimir Putin: http://tinyurl.com/orxslpr

LORD PALMERSTON’S MULTICULTURAL HUMAN ZOO, by Webster G. Tarpley: http://www.abjpress.com/tarpb4.html


The Comic News, Lincoln, and the Civil War: http://tinyurl.com/prkv99g

Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston: http://tinyurl.com/p8ttoca

Henry John Temple, Viscount Palmerston (1784-1865): http://tinyurl.com/plytyaz

Trent Affair: http://tinyurl.com/q2yeyhc

Europe and the American Civil War:

Much more serious was the situation that developed late in the summer of 1862. At that time, as far as any European could see, the Confederacy was beginning to look very much like a winner – a point which James Mason insistently pressed home with British officialdom. The Northern attempt to capture the Confederate capital had failed, Virginia’s soil had been cleared of invaders, and in the East and West alike the Confederates were on the offensive. Minister Adams warned Seward that the British government might very soon offer to mediate the difficulty between North and South, which would be a polite but effective way of intimating that in the opinion of Great Britain the quarrel had gone on long enough and ought to be ended-by giving the South what it wanted. Adams knew what he was talking about. Earl Russell had given Mason no encouragement whatever, but after news of the Second Battle of Bull Pun reached London, he and Lord Palmerston, the Prime Minister, agreed that along in late September or thereabouts there should be a cabinet meeting at which Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary would ask approval of the mediation proposal. (Implicit in all of this was the idea that if the Northern government should refuse to accept mediation, Britain would go ahead and recognize the Confederacy.) With a saving note of caution, Russell and Palmerston concluded not to bring the plan before the cabinet until they got further word about Lee’s invasion of the North. If the Federals were beaten, then the proposal would go through; if Lee failed, then it might be well to wait a little longer before taking any action.

http://www.civilwarhome.com/europeandcivilwar.htm


Undeniable, glaringly obvious facts about the US, Russia & Syria that people need to get into their heads: http://tinyurl.com/qx5fbyf

Keep this little history lesson in mind the next time the media start another smear campaign against whatever evil dictator du jour finds his or her way onto the Pentagon hit list.

Terms like “the responsibility to protect”, “moderate rebels”, “humanitarian intervention”, and “evil dictator” are usually nothing more than doublespeak dreamed up by some PR agency. Ask the people of Libya what they think of the US / EU “humanitarian intervention” now that they live in the chaos and hell that followed the removal of their “evil dictator” from power.

If nothing else, consider all the taxpayer money wasted on these interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, just to name a few. You pay for all of this.

Ignore the consequences of endless foreign interventions at your own peril.

syrian-toddler   Rest in peace, little boy.


Wherever the standard of freedom and independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. She will recommend the general cause, by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example. She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself, beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force. The frontlet upon her brows would no longer beam with the ineffable splendor of freedom and independence; but in its stead would soon be substituted an imperial diadem, flashing in false and tarnished lustre the murky radiance of dominion and power. She might become the dictatress of the world: she would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit.

– JOHN QUINCY ADAMS

‘She Goes Not Abroad in Search of Monsters to Destroy’: http://tinyurl.com/qz4pfd3